🔗 Share this article

Whenever a major honors show nears, there’s always a clamor for introducing of new categories to recognize overlooked contributions and delight the hearts of fans who have specialized interests.

Another commentator made the case for a horror game category. That would be fantastic. Equally deserving are strategy board titles, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. Yet I need to apologize in advance when I prioritize just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, there's a strong justification supporting my request is the most urgent and significant. Here's the proposal: There should be a classification for brain-teasing titles.

Categorizing Game Types

Organizing artistic expressions is not a science; it remains highly personal, and typically spark debates resulting in unclear classifications. It's understandable that movie academies don’t do it. However, it represents a necessary evil within the realm of gaming, showing incredible range they barely qualify a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to receive acknowledgment, and for games of all stripes to have a chance for representation, classification by type becomes crucial.

Current Gaming Award Categories

Leading game ceremonies currently feature classifications covering Action-oriented games, Action/Adventure, Role-Playing, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, plus athletic and racing experiences. Between them, these six categories successfully include many game types, allowing placement for numerous titles.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Think about these this year’s best games, showing diverse approaches: structural challenges of one title, intense tile-matching from another release, thought-provoking social scenarios of a third title. Which classification works among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Acknowledgment Issues

Numerous examples exist outstanding logic titles published annually without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit award groups including Handheld titles, Virtual reality experiences, or the intensely contested Indie races.

• An iconic brain-teaser received no recognition for anything that year
• A different innovative game was excluded in 2019
• Well-received sorting experience got ignored in 2021
• Just some logic titles scraped into independent or mobile categories

Importance of Logic Titles

Frequently they represent compact experiences, but the art in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Well-known matching games stand as most popular titles worldwide maintaining this status for many years.

The famous puzzle experience challenges popular creative games competing to become best-selling game of all time; it’s also in the running for top gaming experience. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, and they are in conversation across multiple categories.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. One could readily select multiple candidates engaging, different, qualified experiences each ceremony simply — perhaps, with difficulty, given the need to exclude numerous deserving experiences.

To emphasize again, these include experiences that otherwise have no home in important events. Puzzle game makers function at the hard edge of video game design, producing among the purest expressions of the video game form. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they merit acknowledgment. Let’s not keep them waiting decades.