🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document offers a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that unrestrained immigration and what it terms "progressive" policies pose an existential risk to European civilization. Yet, this perspective rests on a fundamental misreading of the reality. The true danger confronting Europe is not societal but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Separating Europe and the US

Statistics reveal a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, American economic output grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. Over this time, European income per person fell from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even the poorest US state now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Today, about 50% of the world’s 50 largest tech companies are American, while a mere four are European.

The Innovation Deficit: The Core Problem

This widening economic gap stems from superior efficiency gains in the United States, largely due to technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is decidedly American. In the last five decades, 241 US firms have scaled into enterprises valued at more than ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This disparity raises a vital question: In the race for tomorrow's sectors like semiconductors, AI, and quantum computing, where does the EU stand? Most analysts concede it is largely a two-horse race involving the United States and China, with European nations entering at a clear disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a much more robust and agile network for funding startups. The EU still lacks a genuine capital markets union, a factor that caps the growth potential of emerging companies.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Complex and divided regulation hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a service under a single set of laws to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a larger population size, is split among 27 separate systems, creating significant market obstacles.
• Mindset Differences: Views on risk-taking vary greatly. In some EU nations, business failure was once viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often considered a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The US benefits from a tightly woven innovation pipeline linking defense and academia. Europe's chronic underinvestment in military capabilities has eroded its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, there are reasons for hope. Policymakers are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to advance serious reform. Notable analyses on European competitiveness and the internal market highlight the necessity of major changes.

Given appropriate policies and regulatory reforms, these assets could support much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses considerable advantages: skilled workforce, top-tier schools and universities, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and high savings rates, these foundations have the potential to trigger a surge of venture creation.

Crucially, even if the EU does not take the lead in developing next-generation technologies, it can still significantly increase productivity by adopting and adapting innovations from other regions.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a critical crossroads. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been gradual. However, without bold steps to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.